Bipartisan NHouse vote kills right-to-work bill

A large crowd gathered in front of the New Hampshire State House on Thursday to oppose a right-to-work bill, which lawmakers voted to indefinitely postpone, effectively killing the legislation.

A large crowd gathered in front of the New Hampshire State House on Thursday to oppose a right-to-work bill, which lawmakers voted to indefinitely postpone, effectively killing the legislation. Charlotte Matherly—Concord Monitor

By CHARLOTTE MATHERLY

Monitor staff

Published: 02-13-2025 3:53 PM

As the results flashed on the House of Representatives screens – solidifying a vote to kill a bill that would’ve made New Hampshire a “right-to-work” state – union members and legislators alike erupted in applause.

In a 200-180 vote, 25 Republicans joined Democrats to indefinitely postpone the bill, meaning it can’t return in a similar form for the next two years. House Bill 283 would’ve prohibited collective bargaining agreements from requiring workers to join or contribute financially to unions.

Union members and other advocates rallied on the State House lawn early on Thursday and lined the Capitol building’s halls, urging legislators to vote it down.

Before any debate, Derry Republican Stephen Pearson motioned to kill the legislation, arguing that to pass it would go against President Donald Trump’s wishes. He said right-to-work is no longer a priority on the national Republican agenda and only serves to “alienate” people from the Republican Party.

On a practical note, opponents of the bill said, voting it down wouldn’t change any of the current legal protections for workers.

“Many of you support right-to-work because you feel that someone should not have to join a union to get a job. I completely and totally agree with that,” Pearson said, but he argued current state law already prohibits coercing anyone to join a union as a condition of employment.

Antrim Rep. Jim Creighton, a Republican, had advocated for a full discussion and vote on the bill, saying he viewed it not as “anti-union” but as “pro-worker.”

“HB 238 is vital to fair employment practices,” he said. “Workers and employers should have the option to negotiate their own employment agreement. We owe it to our businesses to hear these arguments.”

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

When is your car inspection due? Maybe never
Inside the government efficiency campaign that cut $2 million from the Merrimack Valley schools’ budget
‘What the hell is going on?”: Chichester votes to defund entire town administrative office, but may reconsider
USDA eliminates two local food programs that help the NH Food Bank and local schools
Sunshine Week: Searchable database of what Concord city employees were paid in 2024
Loudon Road bridge in Concord up for repair as federal funding gets shaky

Charlotte Matherly is the statehouse reporter for the Concord Monitor and Monadnock Ledger-Transcript in partnership with Report for America. Follow her on X at @charmatherly, subscribe to her Capital Beat newsletter and email her at cmatherly@cmonitor.com.